Eswatini vs Guyana: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Eswatini
3.17 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Guyana
2.74 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Eswatini rank
153rd
Guyana rank
156th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guyana
1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B3.0B196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3.17 billion kilocalories per day against 2.74 billion kilocalories per day in Guyana, a difference of 425.17 million kilocalories per day.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Guyana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guyana ahead.

Eswatini ranks 153rd and Guyana ranks 156th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Guyana in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guyana Difference Ahead
1960s 854.59 million kilocalories per day 1.46 billion kilocalories per day 602.61 million kilocalories per day Guyana
1970s 1.21 billion kilocalories per day 1.77 billion kilocalories per day 562.36 million kilocalories per day Guyana
1980s 1.70 billion kilocalories per day 1.87 billion kilocalories per day 166.84 million kilocalories per day Guyana
1990s 2.15 billion kilocalories per day 1.85 billion kilocalories per day 304.95 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
2000s 2.60 billion kilocalories per day 2.04 billion kilocalories per day 559.67 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
2010s 2.69 billion kilocalories per day 2.20 billion kilocalories per day 490.80 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
2020s 3.08 billion kilocalories per day 2.62 billion kilocalories per day 454.50 million kilocalories per day Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Eswatini or Guyana?
Eswatini, at 3.17 billion kilocalories per day against 2.74 billion kilocalories per day in Guyana as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Eswatini and Guyana?
425.17 million kilocalories per day, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guyana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guyana rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Eswatini ranks 153rd and Guyana ranks 156th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guyana: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/eswatini/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/eswatini/guyana/">Eswatini vs Guyana: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.