Ecuador vs Guatemala: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Ecuador
47.12 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Guatemala
51.17 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Ecuador rank
70th
Guatemala rank
69th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Ecuador
  • Guatemala
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 51.17 billion kilocalories per day against 47.12 billion kilocalories per day in Ecuador, a difference of 4.05 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 70th and Guatemala ranks 69th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 11.08 billion kilocalories per day 9.20 billion kilocalories per day 1.88 billion kilocalories per day Ecuador
1970s 15.18 billion kilocalories per day 12.68 billion kilocalories per day 2.50 billion kilocalories per day Ecuador
1980s 20.36 billion kilocalories per day 17.55 billion kilocalories per day 2.81 billion kilocalories per day Ecuador
1990s 25.79 billion kilocalories per day 22.30 billion kilocalories per day 3.50 billion kilocalories per day Ecuador
2000s 30.64 billion kilocalories per day 29.55 billion kilocalories per day 1.09 billion kilocalories per day Ecuador
2010s 41.53 billion kilocalories per day 40.16 billion kilocalories per day 1.37 billion kilocalories per day Ecuador
2020s 45.80 billion kilocalories per day 49.06 billion kilocalories per day 3.26 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Ecuador or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 51.17 billion kilocalories per day against 47.12 billion kilocalories per day in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Ecuador and Guatemala?
4.05 billion kilocalories per day, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Guatemala rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Ecuador ranks 70th and Guatemala ranks 69th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Guatemala: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/ecuador/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/ecuador/guatemala/">Ecuador vs Guatemala: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.