Djibouti vs Eswatini: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Djibouti
3.14 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Eswatini
3.17 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Djibouti rank
155th
Eswatini rank
153rd

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Djibouti
  • Eswatini
01.0B2.0B3.0B196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3.17 billion kilocalories per day against 3.14 billion kilocalories per day in Djibouti, a difference of 29.94 million kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Djibouti ranks 155th and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 189.31 million kilocalories per day 854.59 million kilocalories per day 665.28 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
1970s 366.33 million kilocalories per day 1.21 billion kilocalories per day 844.78 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
1980s 669.65 million kilocalories per day 1.70 billion kilocalories per day 1.03 billion kilocalories per day Eswatini
1990s 1.10 billion kilocalories per day 2.15 billion kilocalories per day 1.05 billion kilocalories per day Eswatini
2000s 1.72 billion kilocalories per day 2.60 billion kilocalories per day 885.16 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
2010s 2.65 billion kilocalories per day 2.69 billion kilocalories per day 33.77 million kilocalories per day Eswatini
2020s 3.09 billion kilocalories per day 3.08 billion kilocalories per day 12.87 million kilocalories per day Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Djibouti or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 3.17 billion kilocalories per day against 3.14 billion kilocalories per day in Djibouti as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Djibouti and Eswatini?
29.94 million kilocalories per day, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Djibouti and Eswatini rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Djibouti ranks 155th and Eswatini ranks 153rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Eswatini: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/djibouti/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/djibouti/eswatini/">Djibouti vs Eswatini: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.