Denmark vs Paraguay: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Denmark
22.21 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Paraguay
20.99 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Denmark rank
104th
Paraguay rank
106th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Denmark
  • Paraguay
5.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B196119922023

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 22.21 billion kilocalories per day against 20.99 billion kilocalories per day in Paraguay, a difference of 1.22 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.1 times Paraguay's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 104th and Paraguay ranks 106th of 191 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 14.79 billion kilocalories per day 5.00 billion kilocalories per day 9.79 billion kilocalories per day Denmark
1970s 15.41 billion kilocalories per day 6.89 billion kilocalories per day 8.52 billion kilocalories per day Denmark
1980s 16.06 billion kilocalories per day 9.24 billion kilocalories per day 6.82 billion kilocalories per day Denmark
1990s 17.33 billion kilocalories per day 11.94 billion kilocalories per day 5.39 billion kilocalories per day Denmark
2000s 18.25 billion kilocalories per day 15.28 billion kilocalories per day 2.97 billion kilocalories per day Denmark
2010s 20.61 billion kilocalories per day 18.97 billion kilocalories per day 1.64 billion kilocalories per day Denmark
2020s 22.27 billion kilocalories per day 20.75 billion kilocalories per day 1.52 billion kilocalories per day Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Denmark or Paraguay?
Denmark, at 22.21 billion kilocalories per day against 20.99 billion kilocalories per day in Paraguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Denmark and Paraguay?
1.22 billion kilocalories per day, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Paraguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Paraguay rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Denmark ranks 104th and Paraguay ranks 106th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Paraguay: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/denmark/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/denmark/paraguay/">Denmark vs Paraguay: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.