Colombia vs Tanzania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Colombia
163.57 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Tanzania
167.76 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Colombia rank
28th
Tanzania rank
27th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Colombia
  • Tanzania
050.0B100.0B150.0B196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 167.76 billion kilocalories per day against 163.57 billion kilocalories per day in Colombia, a difference of 4.19 billion kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 28th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 191 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 38.81 billion kilocalories per day 20.40 billion kilocalories per day 18.41 billion kilocalories per day Colombia
1970s 54.35 billion kilocalories per day 31.62 billion kilocalories per day 22.73 billion kilocalories per day Colombia
1980s 75.28 billion kilocalories per day 48.32 billion kilocalories per day 26.96 billion kilocalories per day Colombia
1990s 97.85 billion kilocalories per day 61.51 billion kilocalories per day 36.34 billion kilocalories per day Colombia
2000s 119.00 billion kilocalories per day 80.96 billion kilocalories per day 38.05 billion kilocalories per day Colombia
2010s 140.45 billion kilocalories per day 121.34 billion kilocalories per day 19.11 billion kilocalories per day Colombia
2020s 160.50 billion kilocalories per day 156.56 billion kilocalories per day 3.95 billion kilocalories per day Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Colombia or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 167.76 billion kilocalories per day against 163.57 billion kilocalories per day in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Colombia and Tanzania?
4.19 billion kilocalories per day, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Tanzania rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Colombia ranks 28th and Tanzania ranks 27th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tanzania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/colombia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/colombia/tanzania/">Colombia vs Tanzania: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.