Cambodia vs Guatemala: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Cambodia
46.05 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Guatemala
51.17 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Cambodia rank
71st
Guatemala rank
69th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Cambodia
  • Guatemala
10.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 51.17 billion kilocalories per day against 46.05 billion kilocalories per day in Cambodia, a difference of 5.12 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 71st and Guatemala ranks 69th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 12.53 billion kilocalories per day 9.20 billion kilocalories per day 3.33 billion kilocalories per day Cambodia
1970s 12.96 billion kilocalories per day 12.68 billion kilocalories per day 273.65 million kilocalories per day Cambodia
1980s 14.04 billion kilocalories per day 17.55 billion kilocalories per day 3.51 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
1990s 21.01 billion kilocalories per day 22.30 billion kilocalories per day 1.28 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala
2000s 30.47 billion kilocalories per day 29.55 billion kilocalories per day 919.98 million kilocalories per day Cambodia
2010s 40.78 billion kilocalories per day 40.16 billion kilocalories per day 624.51 million kilocalories per day Cambodia
2020s 45.61 billion kilocalories per day 49.06 billion kilocalories per day 3.45 billion kilocalories per day Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Cambodia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 51.17 billion kilocalories per day against 46.05 billion kilocalories per day in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Cambodia and Guatemala?
5.12 billion kilocalories per day, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Guatemala rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Cambodia ranks 71st and Guatemala ranks 69th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Guatemala: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/cambodia/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/cambodia/guatemala/">Cambodia vs Guatemala: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.