Cape Verde vs Iceland: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Cape Verde
1.46 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Iceland
1.43 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Cape Verde rank
165th
Iceland rank
166th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Iceland
250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B1.5B196119922023

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 1.46 billion kilocalories per day against 1.43 billion kilocalories per day in Iceland, a difference of 32.56 million kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 165th and Iceland ranks 166th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 385.80 million kilocalories per day 591.65 million kilocalories per day 205.85 million kilocalories per day Iceland
1970s 535.04 million kilocalories per day 654.49 million kilocalories per day 119.45 million kilocalories per day Iceland
1980s 767.13 million kilocalories per day 767.57 million kilocalories per day 435,900 kilocalories per day Iceland
1990s 930.30 million kilocalories per day 826.11 million kilocalories per day 104.19 million kilocalories per day Cape Verde
2000s 1.16 billion kilocalories per day 979.49 million kilocalories per day 184.22 million kilocalories per day Cape Verde
2010s 1.35 billion kilocalories per day 1.16 billion kilocalories per day 188.60 million kilocalories per day Cape Verde
2020s 1.46 billion kilocalories per day 1.38 billion kilocalories per day 71.97 million kilocalories per day Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Cape Verde or Iceland?
Cape Verde, at 1.46 billion kilocalories per day against 1.43 billion kilocalories per day in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Cape Verde and Iceland?
32.56 million kilocalories per day, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cape Verde and Iceland rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Cape Verde ranks 165th and Iceland ranks 166th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Iceland: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/cabo-verde/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/cabo-verde/iceland/">Cape Verde vs Iceland: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.