Botswana vs Namibia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Botswana
6.73 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Namibia
7.65 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Botswana rank
141st
Namibia rank
139th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Botswana
  • Namibia
2.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 7.65 billion kilocalories per day against 6.73 billion kilocalories per day in Botswana, a difference of 917.19 million kilocalories per day.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Botswana ranks 141st and Namibia ranks 139th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.19 billion kilocalories per day 1.53 billion kilocalories per day 339.39 million kilocalories per day Namibia
1970s 1.62 billion kilocalories per day 1.95 billion kilocalories per day 324.58 million kilocalories per day Namibia
1980s 2.47 billion kilocalories per day 2.48 billion kilocalories per day 14.57 million kilocalories per day Namibia
1990s 3.38 billion kilocalories per day 3.36 billion kilocalories per day 15.94 million kilocalories per day Botswana
2000s 4.01 billion kilocalories per day 4.46 billion kilocalories per day 450.65 million kilocalories per day Namibia
2010s 5.50 billion kilocalories per day 5.69 billion kilocalories per day 186.93 million kilocalories per day Namibia
2020s 6.53 billion kilocalories per day 7.17 billion kilocalories per day 634.42 million kilocalories per day Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Botswana or Namibia?
Namibia, at 7.65 billion kilocalories per day against 6.73 billion kilocalories per day in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Botswana and Namibia?
917.19 million kilocalories per day, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Namibia rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Botswana ranks 141st and Namibia ranks 139th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Namibia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/botswana/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/botswana/namibia/">Botswana vs Namibia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.