Barbados vs New Caledonia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Barbados
880.33 million kilocalories per day
in 2023
New Caledonia
874.37 million kilocalories per day
in 2023
Barbados rank
172nd
New Caledonia rank
173rd

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Barbados
  • New Caledonia
200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 880.33 million kilocalories per day against 874.37 million kilocalories per day in New Caledonia, a difference of 5.96 million kilocalories per day.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 172nd and New Caledonia ranks 173rd of 191 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 620.46 million kilocalories per day 265.86 million kilocalories per day 354.60 million kilocalories per day Barbados
1970s 707.05 million kilocalories per day 381.09 million kilocalories per day 325.96 million kilocalories per day Barbados
1980s 767.18 million kilocalories per day 432.70 million kilocalories per day 334.49 million kilocalories per day Barbados
1990s 772.25 million kilocalories per day 509.35 million kilocalories per day 262.90 million kilocalories per day Barbados
2000s 777.53 million kilocalories per day 628.35 million kilocalories per day 149.18 million kilocalories per day Barbados
2010s 854.13 million kilocalories per day 775.00 million kilocalories per day 79.13 million kilocalories per day Barbados
2020s 889.34 million kilocalories per day 854.51 million kilocalories per day 34.83 million kilocalories per day Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Barbados or New Caledonia?
Barbados, at 880.33 million kilocalories per day against 874.37 million kilocalories per day in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Barbados and New Caledonia?
5.96 million kilocalories per day, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and New Caledonia rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Barbados ranks 172nd and New Caledonia ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs New Caledonia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/barbados/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/barbados/new-caledonia/">Barbados vs New Caledonia: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.