Bangladesh vs Mexico: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Bangladesh
443.70 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Mexico
428.73 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
10th
Mexico rank
11th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mexico
100.0B200.0B300.0B400.0B196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 443.70 billion kilocalories per day against 428.73 billion kilocalories per day in Mexico, a difference of 14.96 billion kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 10th and Mexico ranks 11th of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 121.38 billion kilocalories per day 108.80 billion kilocalories per day 12.58 billion kilocalories per day Bangladesh
1970s 146.10 billion kilocalories per day 162.86 billion kilocalories per day 16.75 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
1980s 192.40 billion kilocalories per day 235.47 billion kilocalories per day 43.07 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
1990s 249.01 billion kilocalories per day 281.60 billion kilocalories per day 32.58 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
2000s 334.61 billion kilocalories per day 339.21 billion kilocalories per day 4.60 billion kilocalories per day Mexico
2010s 386.61 billion kilocalories per day 381.14 billion kilocalories per day 5.47 billion kilocalories per day Bangladesh
2020s 438.30 billion kilocalories per day 419.46 billion kilocalories per day 18.84 billion kilocalories per day Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Bangladesh or Mexico?
Bangladesh, at 443.70 billion kilocalories per day against 428.73 billion kilocalories per day in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Bangladesh and Mexico?
14.96 billion kilocalories per day, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Mexico rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Bangladesh ranks 10th and Mexico ranks 11th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mexico: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/bangladesh/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/bangladesh/mexico/">Bangladesh vs Mexico: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.