Australia vs Nepal: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Australia
94.22 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Nepal
86.70 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Australia rank
47th
Nepal rank
50th

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Australia
  • Nepal
20.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B100.0B196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 94.22 billion kilocalories per day against 86.70 billion kilocalories per day in Nepal, a difference of 7.52 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 47th and Nepal ranks 50th of 191 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 35.83 billion kilocalories per day 18.45 billion kilocalories per day 17.39 billion kilocalories per day Australia
1970s 42.66 billion kilocalories per day 22.41 billion kilocalories per day 20.25 billion kilocalories per day Australia
1980s 48.60 billion kilocalories per day 31.54 billion kilocalories per day 17.06 billion kilocalories per day Australia
1990s 55.58 billion kilocalories per day 45.54 billion kilocalories per day 10.05 billion kilocalories per day Australia
2000s 63.86 billion kilocalories per day 59.51 billion kilocalories per day 4.35 billion kilocalories per day Australia
2010s 83.31 billion kilocalories per day 75.12 billion kilocalories per day 8.19 billion kilocalories per day Australia
2020s 91.60 billion kilocalories per day 87.10 billion kilocalories per day 4.51 billion kilocalories per day Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Australia or Nepal?
Australia, at 94.22 billion kilocalories per day against 86.70 billion kilocalories per day in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Australia and Nepal?
7.52 billion kilocalories per day, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Nepal rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Australia ranks 47th and Nepal ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Nepal: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/australia/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/australia/nepal/">Australia vs Nepal: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.