Argentina vs Myanmar: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Argentina
153.03 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Myanmar
152.06 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Argentina rank
31st
Myanmar rank
32nd

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Argentina
  • Myanmar
25.0B50.0B75.0B100.0B125.0B150.0B196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 153.03 billion kilocalories per day against 152.06 billion kilocalories per day in Myanmar, a difference of 966.00 million kilocalories per day.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 31st and Myanmar ranks 32nd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 6 and Myanmar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 70.40 billion kilocalories per day 35.91 billion kilocalories per day 34.49 billion kilocalories per day Argentina
1970s 82.24 billion kilocalories per day 45.41 billion kilocalories per day 36.83 billion kilocalories per day Argentina
1980s 92.46 billion kilocalories per day 61.66 billion kilocalories per day 30.79 billion kilocalories per day Argentina
1990s 107.87 billion kilocalories per day 79.37 billion kilocalories per day 28.50 billion kilocalories per day Argentina
2000s 119.81 billion kilocalories per day 107.32 billion kilocalories per day 12.49 billion kilocalories per day Argentina
2010s 136.14 billion kilocalories per day 139.83 billion kilocalories per day 3.69 billion kilocalories per day Myanmar
2020s 151.45 billion kilocalories per day 151.31 billion kilocalories per day 143.75 million kilocalories per day Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Argentina or Myanmar?
Argentina, at 153.03 billion kilocalories per day against 152.06 billion kilocalories per day in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Argentina and Myanmar?
966.00 million kilocalories per day, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Myanmar rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Argentina ranks 31st and Myanmar ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Myanmar: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/argentina/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/argentina/myanmar/">Argentina vs Myanmar: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.