Angola vs Cameroon: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Angola
88.18 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Cameroon
82.31 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Angola rank
49th
Cameroon rank
51st

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Angola
  • Cameroon
020.0B40.0B60.0B80.0B196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 88.18 billion kilocalories per day against 82.31 billion kilocalories per day in Cameroon, a difference of 5.87 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Cameroon's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cameroon ahead.

Angola ranks 49th and Cameroon ranks 51st of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Cameroon in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Cameroon Difference Ahead
1960s 10.17 billion kilocalories per day 12.33 billion kilocalories per day 2.16 billion kilocalories per day Cameroon
1970s 12.78 billion kilocalories per day 17.38 billion kilocalories per day 4.60 billion kilocalories per day Cameroon
1980s 15.16 billion kilocalories per day 21.57 billion kilocalories per day 6.42 billion kilocalories per day Cameroon
1990s 20.06 billion kilocalories per day 28.39 billion kilocalories per day 8.32 billion kilocalories per day Cameroon
2000s 33.67 billion kilocalories per day 41.34 billion kilocalories per day 7.67 billion kilocalories per day Cameroon
2010s 68.32 billion kilocalories per day 63.43 billion kilocalories per day 4.89 billion kilocalories per day Angola
2020s 84.43 billion kilocalories per day 78.79 billion kilocalories per day 5.64 billion kilocalories per day Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Angola or Cameroon?
Angola, at 88.18 billion kilocalories per day against 82.31 billion kilocalories per day in Cameroon as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Angola and Cameroon?
5.87 billion kilocalories per day, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Cameroon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Cameroon rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Angola ranks 49th and Cameroon ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Cameroon: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/angola/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/angola/cameroon/">Angola vs Cameroon: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.