Algeria vs Poland: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use

Algeria
156.77 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Poland
144.59 billion kilocalories per day
in 2023
Algeria rank
30th
Poland rank
33rd

Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use over time

  • Algeria
  • Poland
050.0B100.0B150.0B196119922023

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 156.77 billion kilocalories per day against 144.59 billion kilocalories per day in Poland, a difference of 12.18 billion kilocalories per day.

That makes Algeria's figure about 1.1 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Algeria ranks 30th and Poland ranks 33rd of 191 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Poland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 20.69 billion kilocalories per day 104.59 billion kilocalories per day 83.90 billion kilocalories per day Poland
1970s 33.98 billion kilocalories per day 119.45 billion kilocalories per day 85.47 billion kilocalories per day Poland
1980s 58.87 billion kilocalories per day 126.28 billion kilocalories per day 67.41 billion kilocalories per day Poland
1990s 80.74 billion kilocalories per day 128.43 billion kilocalories per day 47.69 billion kilocalories per day Poland
2000s 100.96 billion kilocalories per day 129.71 billion kilocalories per day 28.75 billion kilocalories per day Poland
2010s 133.34 billion kilocalories per day 132.01 billion kilocalories per day 1.33 billion kilocalories per day Algeria
2020s 154.76 billion kilocalories per day 141.48 billion kilocalories per day 13.28 billion kilocalories per day Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use, Algeria or Poland?
Algeria, at 156.77 billion kilocalories per day against 144.59 billion kilocalories per day in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use between Algeria and Poland?
12.18 billion kilocalories per day, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Algeria and Poland rank globally for change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use?
Algeria ranks 30th and Poland ranks 33rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Poland: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 23 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/algeria/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-food-supply-population-and-agricultural-land-use/algeria/poland/">Algeria vs Poland: Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in food supply, population, and agricultural land use
Unit
kilocalories per day
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
191 places, 10,151 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Total caloric supply of all agricultural produce, both crops and livestock. Data for world regions has been adjusted for changes in historical boundaries and limited coverage, so that long-term trends can be visualized.