New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population … annual

New Caledonia
95.36 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tunisia
68.92 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
2nd
Tunisia rank
3rd

Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population … annual over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Tunisia
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 95.36 % change on previous year against 68.92 % change on previous year in Tunisia, a difference of 26.44 % change on previous year.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.4 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 39 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Tunisia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 2nd and Tunisia ranks 3rd of 186 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s -6.94 % change on previous year -0.377 % change on previous year 6.56 % change on previous year Tunisia
1970s 10.83 % change on previous year 6.41 % change on previous year 4.42 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1980s 1.12 % change on previous year 8.52 % change on previous year 7.41 % change on previous year Tunisia
1990s 5.4 % change on previous year 21.51 % change on previous year 16.11 % change on previous year Tunisia
2000s 9.6 % change on previous year 15.73 % change on previous year 6.13 % change on previous year Tunisia
2010s 6.95 % change on previous year 6.31 % change on previous year 0.6409 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2020s -0.2145 % change on previous year -0.6 % change on previous year 0.3855 % change on previous year New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual, New Caledonia or Tunisia?
New Caledonia, at 95.36 % change on previous year against 68.92 % change on previous year in Tunisia as of 2024.
What is the difference in change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual between New Caledonia and Tunisia?
26.44 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Tunisia rank globally for change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual?
New Caledonia ranks 2nd and Tunisia ranks 3rd of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-cereal-production-yield-land-use-and-population-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/change-in-cereal-production-yield-land-use-and-population-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/tunisia/">New Caledonia vs Tunisia: Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 10,349 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Change in cereal production, yield, land use and population. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.