Cuba vs Sudan: Cereals, primary — Production, per square kilometre
Cuba
2.05 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
2.23 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
116th
Sudan rank
113th
Cereals, primary — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Cuba
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2.23 t per square kilometre against 2.05 t per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.18 t per square kilometre.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 113th of 159 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.56 t per square kilometre | 3.33 t per square kilometre | 5.24 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
| 2020s | 3.66 t per square kilometre | 3.01 t per square kilometre | 0.6476 t per square kilometre | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals, primary — production, per square kilometre, Cuba or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2.23 t per square kilometre against 2.05 t per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals, primary — production, per square kilometre between Cuba and Sudan?
- 0.18 t per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Sudan rank globally for cereals, primary — production, per square kilometre?
- Cuba ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 113th of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereals, primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.