Congo vs Iceland: Cereals, primary — Production, per square kilometre
Congo
0.0882 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.0762 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
151st
Iceland rank
153rd
Cereals, primary — Production, per square kilometre over time
- Congo
- Iceland
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0882 t per square kilometre against 0.0762 t per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.012 t per square kilometre.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 151st and Iceland ranks 153rd of 159 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0862 t per square kilometre | 0.0622 t per square kilometre | 0.0241 t per square kilometre | Congo |
| 2020s | 0.0883 t per square kilometre | 0.0777 t per square kilometre | 0.0105 t per square kilometre | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals, primary — production, per square kilometre, Congo or Iceland?
- Congo, at 0.0882 t per square kilometre against 0.0762 t per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cereals, primary — production, per square kilometre between Congo and Iceland?
- 0.012 t per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Iceland rank globally for cereals, primary — production, per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 151st and Iceland ranks 153rd of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cereals, primary — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.