Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Cereals, primary: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US
Cereals, primary: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … US over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 40.54 million 1000 USD against 12.46 million 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 28.08 million 1000 USD.
That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.
Across all 64 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 181 countries.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.12 million 1000 USD | 6.51 million 1000 USD | 3.39 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1970s | 4.20 million 1000 USD | 7.79 million 1000 USD | 3.59 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1980s | 5.57 million 1000 USD | 9.06 million 1000 USD | 3.49 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 6.56 million 1000 USD | 11.72 million 1000 USD | 5.16 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 7.74 million 1000 USD | 18.68 million 1000 USD | 10.95 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 8.91 million 1000 USD | 31.93 million 1000 USD | 23.02 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2020s | 12.31 million 1000 USD | 38.83 million 1000 USD | 26.52 million 1000 USD | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 40.54 million 1000 USD against 12.46 million 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 28.08 million 1000 USD, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 16th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.