How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

China rank

43rd

Zimbabwe rank

45th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

China
Zimbabwe

How they compare

China currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 132 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0011 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0008 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1970s	0.0008 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0006 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1980s	0.0006 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Zimbabwe?: China, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Zimbabwe?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do China and Zimbabwe rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: China ranks 43rd and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/china/zimbabwe/">China vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 133 places, 7,065 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.