How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?

40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Malawi: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Burundi

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malawi

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Burundi rank

5th

Malawi rank

8th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Burundi
Malawi

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Malawi, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Malawi ahead.

Burundi ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 8th of 132 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
2010s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Burundi or Malawi?: Burundi, at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Burundi and Malawi?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?: 40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Burundi ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 8th of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 133 places, 7,065 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.