How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and China?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs China: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

China

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bhutan rank

46th

China rank

43rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Bhutan
China

How they compare

China currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 46th and China ranks 43rd of 132 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and China in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	China	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0009 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0008 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1980s	0.0005 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0006 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
1990s	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or China?: China, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bhutan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and China?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and China?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and China rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Bhutan ranks 46th and China ranks 43rd of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs China: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/china/">Bhutan vs China: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 133 places, 7,065 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.