How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Austria vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Austria

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Congo

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Austria rank

103rd

Congo rank

101st

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Austria
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Austria, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 103rd and Congo ranks 101st of 132 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Austria	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Congo
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Austria
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Austria or Congo?: Congo, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Austria as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Austria and Congo?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Congo?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Austria and Congo rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Austria ranks 103rd and Congo ranks 101st of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/austria/congo-rep/">Austria vs Congo: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 133 places, 7,065 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.