What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland?

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland?

10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Antigua and Barbuda vs Iceland: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Antigua and Barbuda

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Iceland

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Antigua and Barbuda rank

128th

Iceland rank

127th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Antigua and Barbuda
Iceland

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 128th and Iceland ranks 127th of 132 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Antigua and Barbuda	Iceland	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Antigua and Barbuda or Iceland?: Iceland, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Iceland rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Antigua and Barbuda ranks 128th and Iceland ranks 127th of 132 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Iceland: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/antigua-and-barbuda/iceland/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Iceland: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 133 places, 7,065 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.