How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Turkmenistan?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tunisia vs Turkmenistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Tunisia

1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Turkmenistan

1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Tunisia rank

100th

Turkmenistan rank

99th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Tunisia
Turkmenistan

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.

Tunisia ranks 100th and Turkmenistan ranks 99th of 133 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Tunisia	Turkmenistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.92 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8293 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.09 1000 USD per square kilometre	Tunisia
2000s	3.09 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre	Tunisia
2010s	3.07 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre	Tunisia
2020s	2.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre	Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Tunisia or Turkmenistan?: Turkmenistan, at 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Tunisia and Turkmenistan?: 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tunisia and Turkmenistan?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Tunisia and Turkmenistan rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Tunisia ranks 100th and Turkmenistan ranks 99th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tunisia vs Turkmenistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/tunisia/turkmenistan/">Tunisia vs Turkmenistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.