Mongolia vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mongolia
0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
127th
Namibia rank
130th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0233 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 130th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0434 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.017 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.0591 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0356 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.1102 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0292 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.081 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0366 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0164 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0458 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0194 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0642 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0457 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0185 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0777 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0618 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.016 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mongolia or Namibia?
Mongolia, at 0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mongolia and Namibia?
0.0233 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Mongolia ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 130th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/namibia/">Mongolia vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.