Malawi vs Nigeria: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malawi
11.95 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
11.28 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
30th
Nigeria rank
32nd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Malawi
  • Nigeria
051015196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 11.95 1000 USD per square kilometre against 11.28 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.67 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nigeria ahead.

Malawi ranks 30th and Nigeria ranks 32nd of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 4 and Nigeria in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 3.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.126 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
1970s 4.47 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3972 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 5.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.21 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2000s 7.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.71 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
2010s 10.9 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8651 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 13.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malawi or Nigeria?
Malawi, at 11.95 1000 USD per square kilometre against 11.28 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malawi and Nigeria?
0.67 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nigeria?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Nigeria rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malawi ranks 30th and Nigeria ranks 32nd of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Nigeria: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/malawi/nigeria/">Malawi vs Nigeria: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.