Jamaica vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Jamaica
0.691 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.8464 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
110th
Zambia rank
107th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Jamaica
  • Zambia
01234196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.8464 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.691 1000 USD per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 0.1554 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Jamaica's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 107th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.245 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 2.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3515 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.98 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3017 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 0.6765 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2926 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.384 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 0.5953 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3712 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2241 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 0.7587 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7079 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0508 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 0.6679 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8334 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1655 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jamaica or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.8464 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.691 1000 USD per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jamaica and Zambia?
0.1554 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Zambia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jamaica ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 107th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/zambia/">Jamaica vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.