How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?

9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland

0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Iceland rank

133rd

Namibia rank

130th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Iceland
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 2.4 times Iceland's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 130th of 133 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0179 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0432 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0253 1000 USD per square kilometre	Namibia
2020s	0.0224 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0618 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0394 1000 USD per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Namibia?: 0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?: 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Iceland ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 130th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.