Gambia vs Uruguay: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gambia
4.51 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
59th
Uruguay rank
57th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Gambia
  • Uruguay
051015196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Gambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 59th and Uruguay ranks 57th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 6 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 3.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8696 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 2.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 3.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.33 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 4.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.04 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 8 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 7.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.12 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 4.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.86 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.426 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gambia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 4.77 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.51 1000 USD per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gambia and Uruguay?
0.26 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Uruguay rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Gambia ranks 59th and Uruguay ranks 57th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Uruguay: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/uruguay/">Gambia vs Uruguay: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.