How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Morocco?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eritrea vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eritrea

3.4 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Morocco

3.38 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Eritrea rank

68th

Morocco rank

69th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Eritrea
Morocco

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 3.4 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.38 1000 USD per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Morocco ahead.

Eritrea ranks 68th and Morocco ranks 69th of 133 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eritrea	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.76 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.32 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5672 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco
2000s	2.51 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.61 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco
2010s	3.29 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.76 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.47 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco
2020s	3.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0422 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eritrea or Morocco?: Eritrea, at 3.4 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.38 1000 USD per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eritrea and Morocco?: 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Morocco?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Eritrea and Morocco rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Eritrea ranks 68th and Morocco ranks 69th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/eritrea/morocco/">Eritrea vs Morocco: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.