How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Luxembourg?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Luxembourg: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Croatia

8.66 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Luxembourg

9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Croatia rank

37th

Luxembourg rank

34th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Croatia
Luxembourg

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in Croatia, a difference of 0.65 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Croatia ranks 37th and Luxembourg ranks 34th of 133 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Luxembourg	Difference	Ahead
2000s	7.87 1000 USD per square kilometre	10.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.53 1000 USD per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2010s	8.27 1000 USD per square kilometre	10.1 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.83 1000 USD per square kilometre	Luxembourg
2020s	9.25 1000 USD per square kilometre	9.64 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.389 1000 USD per square kilometre	Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Croatia or Luxembourg?: Luxembourg, at 9.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in Croatia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Croatia and Luxembourg?: 0.65 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Luxembourg?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Croatia and Luxembourg rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Croatia ranks 37th and Luxembourg ranks 34th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Luxembourg: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/croatia/luxembourg/">Croatia vs Luxembourg: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.