Congo vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
128th
Namibia rank
130th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0147 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 130th of 133 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.036 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.017 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0189 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0626 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0391 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0676 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0292 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0385 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0369 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0349 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.002 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.0475 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0458 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0017 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0457 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0618 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0519 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Namibia?
0.0147 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 128th and Namibia ranks 130th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.