Congo vs Mongolia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
128th
Mongolia rank
127th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Mongolia
00.050.10.15196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mongolia ahead.

Congo ranks 128th and Mongolia ranks 127th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Mongolia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.036 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0434 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.0626 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0591 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0676 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1102 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0426 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.0397 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.053 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0134 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.0475 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0211 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0598 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0642 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0777 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0111 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0666 1000 USD per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Mongolia?
0.0086 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mongolia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mongolia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 128th and Mongolia ranks 127th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mongolia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mongolia/">Congo vs Mongolia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.