Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Colombia
1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
90th
Zimbabwe rank
89th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
0123196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Colombia ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 133 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5669 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6415 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.9028 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 1.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2175 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 USD per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
0 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
44 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Colombia ranks 90th and Zimbabwe ranks 89th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.