China vs Philippines: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China
28.85 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
35.04 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
7th
Philippines rank
5th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China
  • Philippines
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 35.04 1000 USD per square kilometre against 28.85 1000 USD per square kilometre in China, a difference of 6.19 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times China's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

China ranks 7th and Philippines ranks 5th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 4 and Philippines in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Philippines Difference Ahead
1960s 7.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5118 1000 USD per square kilometre China
1970s 11.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9507 1000 USD per square kilometre China
1980s 16.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre China
1990s 19.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 18.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.89 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2000s 19.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.93 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 26.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.26 1000 USD per square kilometre Philippines
2020s 28.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 34.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China or Philippines?
Philippines, at 35.04 1000 USD per square kilometre against 28.85 1000 USD per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China and Philippines?
6.19 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Philippines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Philippines rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China ranks 7th and Philippines ranks 5th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Philippines: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/philippines/">China vs Philippines: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.