Chile vs Puerto Rico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.6594 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
0.6726 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
112th
Puerto Rico rank
111th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Puerto Rico
0123196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.6726 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6594 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Chile ranks 112th and Puerto Rico ranks 111th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Puerto Rico in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4373 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 0.4403 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.932 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4917 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 0.5594 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7905 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2311 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 0.6969 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0947 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6022 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.852 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0739 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7781 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.9471 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0974 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8497 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.7171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5468 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1702 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.6726 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6594 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Puerto Rico?
0.0132 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Puerto Rico rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 112th and Puerto Rico ranks 111th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Puerto Rico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/puerto-rico-us/">Chile vs Puerto Rico: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.