Chile vs Norway: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
0.6594 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.7487 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
112th
Norway rank
109th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Norway
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0.7487 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6594 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.0893 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Chile ranks 112th and Norway ranks 109th of 133 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4373 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5711 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1338 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.4403 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8688 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4285 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.5594 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5416 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.6969 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5255 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.852 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3433 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.9471 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1601 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.7171 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3846 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Norway?
Norway, at 0.7487 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6594 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Norway?
0.0893 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Norway rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 112th and Norway ranks 109th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Norway: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/norway/">Chile vs Norway: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.