Chad vs New Zealand: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad
0.8638 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
105th
New Zealand rank
102nd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chad
  • New Zealand
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8638 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.1862 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Chad's.

Across all 55 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 105th and New Zealand ranks 102nd of 133 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2458 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5335 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2877 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0.1986 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8326 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.634 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0.1824 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7975 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0.3211 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9284 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6073 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.5106 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9726 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4621 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.9086 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2055 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.9011 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1517 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8638 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and New Zealand?
0.1862 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and New Zealand?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and New Zealand rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chad ranks 105th and New Zealand ranks 102nd of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs New Zealand: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/new-zealand/">Chad vs New Zealand: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.