Canada vs Mozambique: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
97th
Mozambique rank
98th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Mozambique
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 97th and Mozambique ranks 98th of 133 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 0.606 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2458 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3602 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.7233 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2491 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4742 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.9279 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2272 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7007 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1990s 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4689 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5458 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.9339 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.744 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1898 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2010s 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9331 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.134 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2020s 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0235 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Mozambique?
Canada, at 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Mozambique?
0.03 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Mozambique rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 97th and Mozambique ranks 98th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Mozambique: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/canada/mozambique/">Canada vs Mozambique: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.