Cambodia vs Pakistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cambodia
21.72 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
20.7 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
11th
Pakistan rank
14th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Pakistan
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 21.72 1000 USD per square kilometre against 20.7 1000 USD per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 11th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 3.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5907 1000 USD per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 2.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 2.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.64 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 4.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.29 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 8.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 15.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6163 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 19.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1123 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cambodia or Pakistan?
Cambodia, at 21.72 1000 USD per square kilometre against 20.7 1000 USD per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cambodia and Pakistan?
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Pakistan rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cambodia ranks 11th and Pakistan ranks 14th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Pakistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/pakistan/">Cambodia vs Pakistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.