Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Burkina Faso
4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
4.04 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
61st
Ecuador rank
62nd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Ecuador
012345196119922023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.04 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 61st and Ecuador ranks 62nd of 133 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6397 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7998 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1602 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.6787 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8617 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.183 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.9688 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3391 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8257 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 2.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9815 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 3.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3236 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 4 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0527 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Burkina Faso or Ecuador?
Burkina Faso, at 4.15 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.04 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Burkina Faso and Ecuador?
0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Ecuador rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Burkina Faso ranks 61st and Ecuador ranks 62nd of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/ecuador/">Burkina Faso vs Ecuador: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.