Bhutan vs Costa Rica: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
0.8927 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
101st
Costa Rica rank
103rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Costa Rica
1234196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8927 1000 USD per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.1773 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Bhutan ranks 101st and Costa Rica ranks 103rd of 133 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3796 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.778 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 1.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9585 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 2.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3461 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0365 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1595 1000 USD per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Costa Rica?
Bhutan, at 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8927 1000 USD per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Costa Rica?
0.1773 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Costa Rica rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 101st and Costa Rica ranks 103rd of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Costa Rica: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/costa-rica/">Bhutan vs Costa Rica: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.