How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lithuania?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Lithuania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Belgium

15.13 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

15.91 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Belgium rank

26th

Lithuania rank

23rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Belgium
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 15.91 1000 USD per square kilometre against 15.13 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.78 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 26th and Lithuania ranks 23rd of 133 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	15.06 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.55 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.5 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belgium
2010s	15.69 1000 USD per square kilometre	12.84 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.84 1000 USD per square kilometre	Belgium
2020s	14.47 1000 USD per square kilometre	16.3 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.83 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Belgium or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 15.91 1000 USD per square kilometre against 15.13 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Belgium and Lithuania?: 0.78 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lithuania?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Lithuania rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Belgium ranks 26th and Lithuania ranks 23rd of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Lithuania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/belgium/lithuania/">Belgium vs Lithuania: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.