Australia vs Kuwait: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Kuwait
1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
95th
Kuwait rank
93rd

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Kuwait
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1968 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 95th and Kuwait ranks 93rd of 133 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kuwait Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5054 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0001 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5053 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.5176 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.002 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5156 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.6916 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0752 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6164 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.8229 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1098 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7131 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.9736 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6023 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3714 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 1 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1188 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3234 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Kuwait?
Kuwait, at 1.35 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Kuwait?
0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kuwait?
56 years are reported by both, from 1968 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kuwait rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 95th and Kuwait ranks 93rd of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kuwait: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/kuwait/">Australia vs Kuwait: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.