Australia vs Canada: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
95th
Canada rank
97th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Australia ranks 95th and Canada ranks 97th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Canada in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3875 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.606 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2185 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.5176 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7233 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2057 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.6916 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9279 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2363 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.8229 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1917 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.9736 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9339 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0398 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2010s 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0544 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia
2020s 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3908 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Canada?
Australia, at 1.3 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Canada?
0.1 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 95th and Canada ranks 97th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.