How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Tajikistan?

27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Tajikistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Armenia

2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Tajikistan

2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Armenia rank

75th

Tajikistan rank

74th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Armenia
Tajikistan

How they compare

Tajikistan currently reports 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 74th of 133 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Tajikistan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	2.75 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9615 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.79 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2000s	3.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.59 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.81 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2010s	4.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre	Armenia
2020s	2.22 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.79 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5704 1000 USD per square kilometre	Tajikistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Armenia or Tajikistan?: Tajikistan, at 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Armenia and Tajikistan?: 0.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Tajikistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Tajikistan?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Tajikistan rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Armenia ranks 75th and Tajikistan ranks 74th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Tajikistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/tajikistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/armenia/tajikistan/">Armenia vs Tajikistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.