How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kazakhstan?

30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Kazakhstan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Angola

0.8681 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

0.8552 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Angola rank

104th

Kazakhstan rank

106th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Angola
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.8681 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8552 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0129 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Angola ranks 104th and Kazakhstan ranks 106th of 133 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5742 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4642 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.1865 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7998 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6133 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	0.4988 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9342 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4354 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	0.8226 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9488 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1261 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Angola or Kazakhstan?: Angola, at 0.8681 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8552 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Angola and Kazakhstan?: 0.0129 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Kazakhstan?: 30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Angola and Kazakhstan rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Angola ranks 104th and Kazakhstan ranks 106th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Kazakhstan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/angola/kazakhstan/">Angola vs Kazakhstan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,380 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.