How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zambia?

50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

New Caledonia vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

New Caledonia

0.0128 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zambia

0.0132 1000 USD per person

in 2024

New Caledonia rank

107th

Zambia rank

106th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

New Caledonia
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0132 1000 USD per person against 0.0128 1000 USD per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0004 1000 USD per person.

Across all 50 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 106th of 133 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	New Caledonia	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0063 1000 USD per person	0.0492 1000 USD per person	0.0429 1000 USD per person	Zambia
1970s	0.0034 1000 USD per person	0.053 1000 USD per person	0.0496 1000 USD per person	Zambia
1980s	0.0041 1000 USD per person	0.033 1000 USD per person	0.0289 1000 USD per person	Zambia
1990s	0.0031 1000 USD per person	0.0279 1000 USD per person	0.0249 1000 USD per person	Zambia
2000s	0.0093 1000 USD per person	0.0218 1000 USD per person	0.0124 1000 USD per person	Zambia
2010s	0.0114 1000 USD per person	0.033 1000 USD per person	0.0216 1000 USD per person	Zambia
2020s	0.0116 1000 USD per person	0.0276 1000 USD per person	0.016 1000 USD per person	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), New Caledonia or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0132 1000 USD per person against 0.0128 1000 USD per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between New Caledonia and Zambia?: 0.0004 1000 USD per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zambia?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Zambia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: New Caledonia ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 106th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/new-caledonia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/new-caledonia/zambia/">New Caledonia vs Zambia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,510 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.