How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Fiji vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Fiji

0.007 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Namibia

0.007 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Fiji rank

115th

Namibia rank

114th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Fiji
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.007 1000 USD per person against 0.007 1000 USD per person in Fiji, a difference of 0 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 114th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Fiji	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0251 1000 USD per person	0.021 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	Fiji
1970s	0.0204 1000 USD per person	0.0223 1000 USD per person	0.0019 1000 USD per person	Namibia
1980s	0.0209 1000 USD per person	0.022 1000 USD per person	0.0011 1000 USD per person	Namibia
1990s	0.0158 1000 USD per person	0.0183 1000 USD per person	0.0025 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2000s	0.0099 1000 USD per person	0.0193 1000 USD per person	0.0094 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2010s	0.0053 1000 USD per person	0.0161 1000 USD per person	0.0108 1000 USD per person	Namibia
2020s	0.0075 1000 USD per person	0.0157 1000 USD per person	0.0083 1000 USD per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Fiji or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.007 1000 USD per person against 0.007 1000 USD per person in Fiji as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Fiji and Namibia?: 0 1000 USD per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Namibia?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Fiji and Namibia rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Fiji ranks 115th and Namibia ranks 114th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Fiji vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/fiji/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/fiji/namibia/">Fiji vs Namibia: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,510 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.