How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Pakistan?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Egypt vs Pakistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt

0.0637 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Pakistan

0.0669 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Egypt rank

58th

Pakistan rank

55th

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Egypt
Pakistan

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0.0669 1000 USD per person against 0.0637 1000 USD per person in Egypt, a difference of 0.0032 1000 USD per person.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 58th and Pakistan ranks 55th of 133 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Egypt	Pakistan	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0639 1000 USD per person	0.049 1000 USD per person	0.015 1000 USD per person	Egypt
1970s	0.0615 1000 USD per person	0.0609 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	Egypt
1980s	0.0548 1000 USD per person	0.0601 1000 USD per person	0.0053 1000 USD per person	Pakistan
1990s	0.0753 1000 USD per person	0.0558 1000 USD per person	0.0195 1000 USD per person	Egypt
2000s	0.0816 1000 USD per person	0.0562 1000 USD per person	0.0255 1000 USD per person	Egypt
2010s	0.0702 1000 USD per person	0.0571 1000 USD per person	0.0132 1000 USD per person	Egypt
2020s	0.0637 1000 USD per person	0.0629 1000 USD per person	0.0008 1000 USD per person	Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Pakistan?: Pakistan, at 0.0669 1000 USD per person against 0.0637 1000 USD per person in Egypt as of 2024.
What is the difference in cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Pakistan?: 0.0032 1000 USD per person, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Pakistan?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Egypt and Pakistan rank globally for cereals, primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Egypt ranks 58th and Pakistan ranks 55th of 133 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Pakistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/cereals-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/egypt-arab-rep/pakistan/">Egypt vs Pakistan: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 134 places, 7,510 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Cereals, primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.